这句话的结构是什么啊？

sabrina2111

Novels, in the proper sense of the word, are not written to vanish in a month or a year. That most of them do, today, that  they are written and published as if they were magazines, to fade as rapidly, is one of the sorriest aspects of today's literature, and one of the clearest indictments of its dorminant esthetic philosophy:oncrete-bounded, ...

请问这句话的主语是什么啊？是标红的第一个还是第二个呢？

渔夫和妖怪

do应该是指vanish

Meier-WL

第二个标红的是主语吧，这里第一个强调了that提前了，其实应该是most of them do that。 仅个人见解，我也还不知道这里第一个标红做什么成分

Meier-WL

Meier-WL 发表于 2021-8-29 10:07
" |# ^/ N1 S; R$ v第二个标红的是主语吧，这里第一个强调了that提前了，其实应该是most of them do that。 仅个人见解，我也 ...

that most of them do 看起来像插入语，但又不符合我所学过的插入语结构

sabrina2111

; E7 l2 `' Z/ E* |& Y6 ]/ C
会不会是同位语啊？我不太确定？我又问了一个句子，也是相关的问题。感觉写得很啰嗦。还有那个do,是不是有点主动表被动的意思啊？

炊爱牛

两个that从句是同位语，主语。do指代上文出现的动词written to vanish

rualantonio

that引导的主语从句，只不过是并列了两个主语从句而已。

sabrina2111

炊爱牛 发表于 2021-8-29 10:38
两个that从句是同位语，主语。do指代上文出现的动词written to vanish

+ W  p. t( U# _: G# I! r+ G; \请问主动表被动怎么用啊？可以写成“That most of them are done"吗？

sabrina2111

rualantonio 发表于 2021-8-29 10:49
that引导的主语从句，只不过是并列了两个主语从句而已。

请问这两个主语说的是不是同一件事？表达的是不是同一个意思呢？这边的do是否可以用被动呢？谢谢

932524511

句子来源是正儿八经杂志吗？这个句子很随意。考虑到谓语是单数is one of the，所以第一个that是主语，第二个that 是同位语。主语的do是前面句子的省略

sabrina2111

932524511 发表于 2021-8-29 12:47
- `; P& g$ L* U6 \5 \句子来源是正儿八经杂志吗？这个句子很随意。考虑到谓语是单数is one of the，所以第一个that是主语，第二 ...

是正经儿的小说The Fountainhead 的introduction部分。我只看了个开头introduction,发现这作者就喜欢写that…开头的名词从句。喜欢写长的句子。

sabrina2111

932524511 发表于 2021-8-29 12:47
( n1 L6 d/ v& Q: g+ l$ a0 U句子来源是正儿八经杂志吗？这个句子很随意。考虑到谓语是单数is one of the，所以第一个that是主语，第二 ...

. l- y+ n  O' r可是我纠结的是前面一句句子是被动哎，这里怎么变成主动了啊？

sabrina2111

From this simplest necessity to the highest religious abstraction,from the wheel to the skyscraper, everything we are and everything we have comes from a single attribute of man — the function of his reasoning mind.
! \4 N5 q8 K1 z9 G3 I0 V, ], c2 G; ]5 M请问这里为什么要用comes呢？是想表达everything是同一个everything还是什么啊？是想表达一个整体概念吗？谢谢！

Meier-WL

炊爱牛 发表于 2021-8-29 10:38
# G+ A( p* L5 o( j" h两个that从句是同位语，主语。do指代上文出现的动词written to vanish

8 V" N$ b1 V! `6 k0 I$ P请问上文出现的动词系表结构，也可以用do 代替吗

Meier-WL

Meier-WL 发表于 2021-8-30 09:18
) L9 }! }' C1 x. o$ r请问上文出现的动词系表结构，也可以用do 代替吗

8 `9 m; d7 ^3 e& Y; Tdo代替谓语哈哈哈，我学的太不扎实了

sabrina2111

Meier-WL 发表于 2021-8-30 09:31
9 L2 O. ~6 K1 \0 ^) Z* e; Edo代替谓语哈哈哈，我学的太不扎实了

你哪有看到do可以代替谓语啊？我只看到可以代替短语或动词

渔夫和妖怪

5 T8 I2 x) K# B- O6 {) ~. {
  r) e; K9 q5 fNovels, in the proper sense of the word, are not written to vanish in a month or a year. That most of them do, (主语) today, that  they are written and published as if they were magazines, to fade as rapidly, （most的同位语，非限制性，补充说明）is one of the sorriest aspects of today's literature, and one of the clearest indictments of its dorminant esthetic philosophy: concrete-bounded, journalistic Naturalism which has now reached its dead end in the inarticulate sounds of panic.